Spread of false accusations & false information

[Spread of false accusations & false information]

On 4/10/2020 at 4:18 AM, Ironyte said:

-snip-

My added suggestion to your suggestion:

• Staff should have a note system in place where they can write an offense on a player and each time that player decides to spread misinformation on a clan, player, etc. it will be recorded. It creates a strike system for that player. Example; ::noteDurial321 accusing player Newgate of RWT 04/09/2020.
• Do not mute, but yell mute instead. A mute is a whole (chat, in-game, yell, etc.) and should be treated individually.. if a player is stating these things inside the yell chat that is the place to mute them, not the in-game chat. Vice-versa applies.

-snip-

 

 

I agree with the first, If they don't already have a tally/note system in place then there needs to be. But I don't agree with the second, If someone is being abusive in ::Yell then they should have their talking ability taken away, not just their yell taken away. I could agree with the second option if there was also a tally for ::yell mutes, where if they are muted 3 times in yell, then their accounts have ::yell removed permanently unless an appeal is made.

On 4/10/2020 at 4:18 AM, Ironyte said:

-snip-

My added suggestion to your suggestion:

• Staff should have a note system in place where they can write an offense on a player and each time that player decides to spread misinformation on a clan, player, etc. it will be recorded. It creates a strike system for that player. Example; ::noteDurial321 accusing player Newgate of RWT 04/09/2020.
• Do not mute, but yell mute instead. A mute is a whole (chat, in-game, yell, etc.) and should be treated individually.. if a player is stating these things inside the yell chat that is the place to mute them, not the in-game chat. Vice-versa applies.

-snip-

 

 

I agree with the first, If they don't already have a tally/note system in place then there needs to be. But I don't agree with the second, If someone is being abusive in ::Yell then they should have their talking ability taken away, not just their yell taken away. I could agree with the second option if there was also a tally for ::yell mutes, where if they are muted 3 times in yell, then their accounts have ::yell removed permanently unless an appeal is made.

On 4/10/2020 at 4:18 AM, Ironyte said:

-snip-

My added suggestion to your suggestion:

• Staff should have a note system in place where they can write an offense on a player and each time that player decides to spread misinformation on a clan, player, etc. it will be recorded. It creates a strike system for that player. Example; ::noteDurial321 accusing player Newgate of RWT 04/09/2020.
• Do not mute, but yell mute instead. A mute is a whole (chat, in-game, yell, etc.) and should be treated individually.. if a player is stating these things inside the yell chat that is the place to mute them, not the in-game chat. Vice-versa applies.

-snip-

 

 

I agree with the first, If they don't already have a tally/note system in place then there needs to be. But I don't agree with the second, If someone is being abusive in ::Yell then they should have their talking ability taken away, not just their yell taken away. I could agree with the second option if there was also a tally for ::yell mutes, where if they are muted 3 times in yell, then their accounts have ::yell removed permanently unless an appeal is made.

[Gamble rank suggestion]

9 hours ago, Brambo said:

Yea thats also good. 

But the thing about paying is that if you scam, you lost the money you paid for the rank, you lose your rank and your dice bag. So no one will really scam. If you for example buy a rank for 150m and you can host up to 100m, why would you scam? Because you will lose your rank (where you paid more money for then you got from the scam) and your dice bag. Maybe even get banned. Thats the idea of the money. 

 

But with the staff is also a good idea. Maybe to get things started up. 

If somebody scams, They should get a new rank that shows people they're not trustworthy. After a probation period they might be able to appeal their 'rank' and get it removed, But at least for the 30 days or how ever long they have it, nobody will use them.