Jump to content
NEW Mobile client Home Community Discord Market Store Hiscores Vote Go back
GAME UPDATE: REVISION UPGRADE + BIGGEST CONTENT ADDITION IN YEARS! [CLICK HERE] ×
GAME UPDATE: REVISION UPGRADE + BIGGEST CONTENT ADDITION IN YEARS! [CLICK HERE]

Corey

Server Management
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    115

  • Avg. Content Per Day

    0.05

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

  • Time Online

    3d 6h 19m 28s

Posts posted by Corey

  5. Posted

    22 hours ago, Fe Felix said:

    definitely +1 to the search option, or maybe even a favorites section.

    However I can't agree with the incomplete set option, in 07 (with POH storage) you aren't able to do so, making it a bit more of a challenge in a way. Having it complete sets only also lets you easily look at what sets you need completed still

     

    Actually you can https://oldschool.runescape.wiki/w/Update:Costume_Room_Rework

     

    I don't see either of these coming as a fair number of cs2 edits are required. Post-revision upgrade sure, but extra care needs to be taken to ensure existing items aren't lost (same still applies to search/favourite option though: cs2)

    • Like 1

  6. Posted · Edited by Corey

    Not sure this will ever be fixed - crossing out names is actually already supported, and has been a thing since before release, but due to database issues accounts are never transitioned to the 'dead hcim' state, meaning they don't get crossed out; this is also why hcim's who die (or any ironman who changes rank) don't update on the hiscores and appear as regular ironmen.

    I'd be worried if anyone actually attempted to fix this, due to the amount of accounts that would need fixing so that the highscores retain their true rankings, not to mention the database and server changes required.

     

    Unfortunately this needs to be filed in the 'never happening' drawer, along with TOB, GIM and construction.

    • Like 3

  8. Posted

    I appreciate the shade being thrown my way 😄

    The reason for the '''''cost''''' (it wasn't really a cost, you still got the entire $20 donation just like normal) was so that users would not request a transfer every other day as they switch accounts and get bored, as it took me (I was the only one, minus Noele, who had access) time to do the transfer and make sure it was all correct. It was not a simple command, I had to manually go into the database and write a query to transfer data. Regardless of how much time it did or didn't take, my primary job was to develop for the server, not to spend my valuable time transferring donations every day.

    Another reason for the ''''cost'''' was so that the server actually got something out of it, and kept people donating which is good for many reasons.

     

    As far as the proposed '''''''''name changes''''''''', I completely agree with @Jakey's stance. It is a horrible hack, and is more of a stat/item transfer than a name transfer. All sorts of things could go wrong, as nothing was written with these sorts of actions in mind.

    • Like 2

  9. Posted

    We've always planned to do this eventually.

    It'll be a difficult task, as a lot can go wrong. We're not currently in a position to offer this, but eventually we'd like to be.

     

    The idea I had is to handle it like OSRS: charge a bond ($10) per name change request - names will be reserved for 30 days just like OSRS, so you can change back at any time without someone else yoinking it.

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...